Why are there revisions to jobs numbers?

July 29, 2013

At the beginning of each month, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reports the change in payroll employment for the previous month. When the estimate is revised in subsequent months, however, data users sometimes perceive a very different picture of the job market than what was initially reported. Why is the initial estimate revised? The revised estimate includes additional information that was not available at the time of the initial release, making the revised estimate more accurate.

Differences between the initial and revised estimates generally indicate that the employment change that occurred at the businesses that had not initially reported was different than the change that occurred at the businesses that had initially reported. For example, if less employment growth occurred among those who had not reported at the time of the first estimate, the initial estimate would be revised down. If more growth occurred among the late responders, the initial estimate would be revised up.

Over-the-month change in employment by closing date of the first, second, and third releases of BLS data, seasonally adjusted, January-December 2012

Over-the-month change in employment by closing date of the first, second, and third releases of BLS data, seasonally adjusted, January—December 2012
MonthSeasonally adjusted
Over-the-month changeRevision in over-the-month change
1st release2nd release3rd release2nd - 1st release3rd - 2nd release3rd - 1st release

January 2012


February 2012


March 2012


April 2012


May 2012


June 2012


July 2012


August 2012


September 2012


October 2012


November 2012


December 2012



So why doesn’t BLS wait until it has all the reports to make the estimate and avoid revisions? Users of the data are intensely interested in the earliest possible read on labor market developments, and experience suggests that the initial estimate is generally very good. For example, in 2012, the average monthly employment change using the first estimate would have been +142,000, compared with a monthly average change of +165,000 using the third estimate. Nevertheless, it is true that in some months, revisions are large enough that they change the users’ perspectives on the current state of the economy. In November 2012, for example, the initial estimate of over-the-month change was +146,000, while the third estimate was +247,000.

These data are from the Current Employment Statistics Survey. To learn more, see “Why are there revisions to the jobs numbers?” (HTML) (PDF), by Thomas Nardone, Kenneth Robertson, and Julie Hatch Maxfield, Beyond the Numbers, July 2013.


Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, The Economics Daily, Why are there revisions to jobs numbers? on the Internet at http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2013/ted_20130729.htm (visited September 26, 2016).


Recent editions of Spotlight on Statistics

  • A look at healthcare spending, employment, pay, benefits, and prices
    As one of the largest U.S. industries, healthcare is steadily growing to meet the needs of an increasing population with an increasing life expectancy. This Spotlight looks at how much people spend on healthcare, current and projected employment in the industry, employer-provided healthcare benefits, healthcare prices, and pay for workers in healthcare occupations.

  • Employment and Wages in Healthcare Occupations
    Healthcare occupations are a significant percentage of U.S. employment. Some of the largest and highest paying occupations are in healthcare. This Spotlight examines employment and wages for healthcare occupations.

  • Fifty years of looking at changes in peoples lives
    Longitudinal surveys help us understand long-term changes, such as how events that happened when a person was in high school affect labor market success as an adult.