News Release Information

18-1875-CHI
Tuesday, January 15, 2019

Contacts

Technical information:
Media contact:
  • (312) 353-1138

County Employment and Wages in Iowa — Second Quarter 2018

Three of the four large counties in Iowa reported employment growth from June 2017 to June 2018, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. (Large counties are defined as those with employment of 75,000 or greater as measured by 2017 annual average employment.) Assistant Commissioner for Regional Operations Charlene Peiffer noted that Polk County had the largest increase, up 0.9 percent, followed by the counties of Linn (0.7 percent) and Johnson (0.6 percent). Scott County had an over-the-year employment decrease of 0.1 percent. Nationally, employment increased 1.5 percent. (See table 1.)

Among the four largest counties in Iowa, employment was highest in Polk County (306,600) in June 2018. Collectively, Iowa’s four large counties accounted for 39.0 percent of total employment within the state. Nationwide, the 349 largest counties made up 72.9 percent of total U.S. employment, which stood at 147.4 million in June 2018.

The average weekly wage in Linn County rose 3.9 percent from the second quarter of 2017 to the second quarter of 2018, the largest increase among Iowa’s large counties. Polk County had the highest average weekly wage in the state at $1,050. (See table 1.) Nationally, the average weekly wage rose 3.4 percent over the year to $1,055 in the second quarter of 2018.

Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for 94 of the 95 counties in Iowa with employment below 75,000. Data were not available for one of the small counties. All of these smaller counties had average weekly wages below the national average. (See table 2.)

Large county wage changes

All four of Iowa’s large counties recorded wage growth above the national increase of 3.4 percent from the second quarter of 2017 to the second quarter of 2018. (See table 1.) Linn County’s 3.9-percent increase in average weekly wages ranked 77th among the 349 largest U.S. counties. Scott County (3.8 percent, 86th), Polk County (3.7 percent, 93rd), and Johnson County (3.7 percent, 93rd) all placed in the top half of the national ranking.

Among the 349 largest U.S. counties, 340 had over-the-year increases in average weekly wages in the second quarter of 2018. Marin, CA, ranked first in average weekly wage growth with a gain of 11.7 percent, followed by the counties of Lake, IL, and King, WA, at 9.3 percent each.

Eight of the 349 largest counties experienced over-the-year decreases in average weekly wages. New Hanover, NC, had the largest percentage decline in average weekly wages with a loss of 6.4 percent. Spartanburg, SC, had the second-largest decline at 2.9 percent, followed by Morris, NJ (-2.4 percent).

Large county average weekly wages

Average weekly wages in all four large Iowa counties were below the national average of $1,055 in the second quarter of 2018. As noted, Polk County ($1,050) had the highest average weekly wage in the state and ranked 97th among the 349 largest U.S. counties. Scott County ($842) reported the lowest average weekly wage among Iowa’s large counties and ranked 294th nationwide.

Nationwide, weekly wages were higher than the U.S. average of $1,055 in 94 of the largest U.S. counties. Santa Clara, CA, held the top position with an average weekly wage of $2,573. San Mateo, CA, was second at $2,357, followed by San Francisco, CA ($2,083), and New York, NY ($2,025).

There were 255 large U.S. counties with an average weekly wage below the national average. Horry, SC ($625) reported the lowest weekly wage, followed by the Texas counties of Cameron ($642), Hidalgo ($645), and Webb ($687).

Average weekly wages in Iowa’s smaller counties

Ninety-four smaller counties in Iowa, those with employment below 75,000, had average weekly wages below the national average of $1,055. Among these smaller counties, Dallas County had the highest average weekly wage at $994 and Decatur County had the lowest at $625. Data were not available for one of the small counties. (See table 2.)

When all 99 counties in Iowa were considered, 17 reported average weekly wages of $699 or lower, 26 reported wages from $700 to $749, 30 had wages from $750 to $799, and 25 had wages of $800 or higher. One county did not have data available. (See chart 1.)

Additional statistics and other information

QCEW data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit www.bls.gov/cew.

Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2017 edition of this publication, which was published in September 2018, contains selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as selected data from the first quarter 2018 version of the national news release. Tables and additional content from Employment and Wages Annual Averages 2017 are now available online at www.bls.gov/cew/cewbultn17.htm. The 2018 edition of Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online will be available in September 2019.

The County Employment and Wages release for third quarter 2018 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, February 20, 2019. The County Employment and Wages full data update for third quarter 2018 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, March 6, 2019.

New BLS Local Data iPhone App Includes QCEW Data

BLS has partnered with the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of the Chief Information Officer to develop a new mobile app for iPhones. The BLS Local Data app is ideal for customers, such as jobseekers and economic and workforce development professionals, who want to know more about local labor markets. For more information, please go to:

https://blogs.bls.gov/blog/2018/10/18/new-bls-local-data-app-now-available/.


Technical Note

Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew; however, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s Web site.

QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons–some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.

The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.

Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339.

Table 1. Covered employment and wages in the United States and the 4 largest counties in Iowa, second quarter 2018
AreaEmploymentAverage weekly wage (1)
June 2018 (thousands)Percent change, June 2017-18 (2)National ranking by percent change (3)Average weekly wageNational ranking by level (3)Percent change, second quarter 2017-18 (2)National ranking by percent change (3)

United States (4)

147,431.21.5--$1,055--3.4--

Iowa

1,583.70.8--880393.319

Johnson, IA

84.40.62509801643.793

Linn, IA

133.70.72351,0081373.977

Polk, IA

306.60.92061,050973.793

Scott, IA

92.7-0.13168422943.886

Footnotes:
(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Percent changes were computed from quarterly employment and pay data adjusted for noneconomic county reclassifications.
(3) Ranking does not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
(4) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.

Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.

 Table 2. Covered employment and wages in the United States and all counties in Iowa, second quarter 2018
AreaEmployment June 2018Average weekly wage(1)

United States(2)

147,431,154$1,055

Iowa

1,583,740880

Adair

2,893712

Adams

1,261722

Allamakee

5,369671

Appanoose

4,597695

Audubon

1,821706

Benton

6,164725

Black Hawk

75,451868

Boone

9,568756

Bremer

10,152769

Buchanan

6,897730

Buena Vista

11,113778

Butler

3,597671

Calhoun

3,033693

Carroll

11,701724

Cass

6,338761

Cedar

5,626730

Cerro Gordo

25,330788

Cherokee

4,841740

Chickasaw

5,085787

Clarke

4,508723

Clay

8,883782

Clayton

7,223762

Clinton

20,999748

Crawford

6,963787

Dallas

46,034994

Davis

--

Decatur

2,426625

Delaware

6,852801

Des Moines

22,687770

Dickinson

11,038676

Dubuque

60,023835

Emmet

3,982736

Fayette

7,438703

Floyd

6,356779

Franklin

4,173824

Fremont

2,328666

Greene

3,436761

Grundy

4,362840

Guthrie

3,294765

Hamilton

6,049768

Hancock

6,654852

Hardin

7,152744

Harrison

4,294719

Henry

9,295795

Howard

4,343707

Humboldt

4,143799

Ida

3,994804

Iowa

10,267750

Jackson

6,552629

Jasper

11,814747

Jefferson

7,890752

Johnson

84,392980

Jones

6,539727

Keokuk

2,259719

Kossuth

7,160811

Lee

15,507820

Linn

133,6681,008

Louisa

4,026730

Lucas

3,586758

Lyon

4,829679

Madison

4,031714

Mahaska

8,202780

Marion

18,288874

Marshall

17,230811

Mills

3,711811

Mitchell

4,081774

Monona

2,735658

Monroe

3,547918

Montgomery

4,162750

Muscatine

23,890936

O'Brien

6,889699

Osceola

2,528748

Page

6,451758

Palo Alto

4,107693

Plymouth

11,921884

Pocahontas

3,294807

Polk

306,6121,050

Pottawattamie

40,342792

Poweshiek

10,291800

Ringgold

1,487673

Sac

3,181716

Scott

92,729842

Shelby

5,933754

Sioux

21,517768

Story

47,030939

Tama

5,738711

Taylor

2,075649

Union

6,250729

Van Buren

1,996694

Wapello

16,372759

Warren

12,007740

Washington

8,519678

Wayne

1,932757

Webster

18,522841

Winnebago

4,300688

Winneshiek

10,757771

Woodbury

52,534784

Worth

2,441701

Wright

5,729847

Footnotes
(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.

NOTE: Dashes indicate data do not meet BLS or State agency disclosure standards.
Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
Data are preliminary.

Table 3. Covered employment and wages by state, second quarter 2018
StateEmploymentAverage weekly wage (1)
June 2018 (thousands)Percent change, June 2017-18Average weekly wageNational ranking by levelPercent change, second quarter 2017-18National ranking by percent change

United States (2)

147,431.21.5$1,055--3.4--

Alabama

1,969.91.2882372.835

Alaska

335.8-0.91,043153.79

Arizona

2,770.82.6973233.319

Arkansas

1,214.60.7824471.747

California

17,473.11.91,26544.63

Colorado

2,704.42.41,075103.227

Connecticut

1,704.50.31,21850.150

Delaware

454.31.31,023171.449

District of Columbia

777.31.31,71312.639

Florida

8,568.92.1931282.932

Georgia

4,440.52.0979222.343

Hawaii

658.30.5956242.541

Idaho

745.33.1794503.88

Illinois

6,061.10.81,09793.414

Indiana

3,075.81.1883362.835

Iowa

1,583.70.8880393.319

Kansas

1,393.31.0879403.414

Kentucky

1,905.90.9882372.343

Louisiana

1,918.60.4901333.79

Maine

636.81.0843453.611

Maryland

2,712.00.71,14183.414

Massachusetts

3,650.11.01,32223.512

Michigan

4,424.71.3997202.932

Minnesota

2,925.60.81,072123.319

Mississippi

1,130.70.2752512.738

Missouri

2,829.00.5924303.97

Montana

478.71.1817482.541

Nebraska

990.80.6859433.129

Nevada

1,372.43.1931283.319

New Hampshire

670.80.81,049143.319

New Jersey

4,157.00.91,20172.343

New Mexico

823.61.0852443.512

New York

9,579.21.71,29734.54

North Carolina

4,450.22.2933253.319

North Dakota

426.10.8986213.414

Ohio

5,461.30.7933252.343

Oklahoma

1,606.41.2875413.227

Oregon

1,947.31.5999183.319

Pennsylvania

5,924.91.11,031163.129

Rhode Island

491.00.7998191.747

South Carolina

2,126.53.4833460.051

South Dakota

439.70.9807492.835

Tennessee

2,994.11.6932272.932

Texas

12,326.32.21,062133.414

Utah

1,483.93.4899354.35

Vermont

312.4-0.8907314.35

Virginia

3,941.01.31,073112.639

Washington

3,444.12.71,21856.91

West Virginia

702.91.6868424.82

Wisconsin

2,933.50.9904323.319

Wyoming

282.20.5901333.031

Puerto Rico

853.5-2.3543(3)5.2(3)

Virgin Islands

33.4-14.4838(3)12.8(3)

Footnotes:
(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
(3) Data not included in the national ranking.

Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.

 

Last Modified Date: Tuesday, January 15, 2019