Annual consumer price rise smallest since 1986
January 15, 1999
The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) rose 1.6 percent from December 1997 to December 1998, after advancing 1.7 percent in 1997. This was the smallest increase reported since a 1.1 percent rise in 1986. The CPI-U measures retail price changes for goods and services purchased by consumers in metropolitan areas.
The moderate increase in 1998 was largely due to falling energy prices. The energy index declined 8.8 percent in 1998, again the largest drop since 1986. Energy commodities, including gasoline, fell 15.1 percent, and charges for energy services decreased 3.3 percent.
The "core" CPI-U, consumer prices excluding food and energy, rose 2.4 percent in 1998, compared with a 2.2 percent increase in 1997. Sharply higher tobacco prices caused the increase in the core rate.
These data are produced by the BLS Consumer Price Index program. More information can be obtained in news release USDL 99-11, "Consumer Price Indexes, December 1998." Annual comparisons are based on changes in indexes from December 1997 to December 1998.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, The Economics Daily, Annual consumer price rise smallest since 1986 on the Internet at https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/1999/jan/wk2/art05.htm (visited September 16, 2019).
Recent editions of Spotlight on Statistics
- 25 years of Worker Injury, Illness, and Fatality Case Data
Examines detailed historical data on work-related injuries, illnesses, and fatal injuries.
- Occupational employment projections through the perspective of education and training
Examines employment, projected employment growth, and wages for occupations with different education and training requirements.
- Workers in Alternative Employment Arrangements
A look at independent contractors, on-call workers, temporary help agency workers, and workers provided by contract firms.
- Labor force characteristics of people with a disability
Examines the labor force characteristics of people with a disability and compares them with the characteristics of people with no disability.