News Release Information
13-123-PHI
Thursday, January 24, 2013
Contacts
Technical information:
- (215) 597-3282
- BLSInfoPhiladelphia@bls.gov
- www.bls.gov/ro3
Media contact:
- (215) 861-5600
- BLSMediaPhiladelphia@bls.gov
County Employment and Wages in Maryland – Second Quarter 2012
Anne Arundel County Employment Gain Ranks in Top Ten Percent Nationwide
Employment rose in seven of the eight large counties in Maryland from June 2011 to June 2012, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. (Large counties are defined as those with employment of 75,000 or more as measured by 2011 annual average employment.) Sheila Watkins, the Bureau’s regional commissioner, noted that Anne Arundel County recorded the largest employment gain, up 3.6 percent over the year. Harford and Howard Counties followed with gains of 3.2 and 2.7 percent, respectively. The smallest employment increase was recorded in Baltimore City, up 0.1 percent since June 2011. Employment in Prince George’s County was unchanged over the year; no county had an employment decline from June 2011 to June 2012.
Nationally, employment grew 1.8 percent during this 12-month period, as 287 of the 328 large counties gained jobs. Yakima County, Wash., posted the largest increase, with a gain of 8.2 percent over the year. Madison, Ill., St. Clair, Ill., and Clay, Mo., experienced the largest over-the-year decreases in employment among the largest counties in the U.S. with losses of 2.0 percent each.
Among the eight largest counties in Maryland, employment was highest in Montgomery County (455,800) in June 2012. Three other counties—Baltimore, Baltimore City, and Prince George’s—had employment levels exceeding 300,000. Together, Maryland’s large counties accounted for 80.0 percent of total employment within the state. Nationwide, the 328 largest counties made up 70.9 percent of total U.S. employment.
Harford County recorded the fastest over-the-year wage growth among Maryland’s eight large counties, rising 2.8 percent from the second quarter of 2011 to the second quarter of 2012. Frederick and Howard Counties followed closely with average weekly wage gains of 2.7 percent each. Montgomery County reported the highest average weekly wage among the state’s large counties at $1,222. Two other counties had weekly wages above $1,000—Howard ($1,106) and Baltimore City ($1,020). (See table 1.) Nationally, the average weekly wage rose 1.3 percent over the year to $903 in the second quarter of 2012.
Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 16 counties in Maryland with employment below 75,000. Fifteen of these smaller counties had average weekly wages below the national average. (See table 2.)
Large county wage changes
Four of Maryland’s eight large counties recorded wage increases larger than the national advance of 1.3 percent from the second quarter of 2011 to the second quarter of 2012. The wage advances in three of these counties ranked in the top one-fourth among the 328 largest counties in the U.S., with Harford County placing 61st and Frederick and Howard Counties tied at 66th. Montgomery County posted a wage gain slightly below that of the nation, while the remaining three large counties in Maryland had wage declines over the year. (See table 1.)
Among the 328 largest counties nationwide, 233 had over-the-year increases in average weekly wages. Washington, Ore., had the largest wage gain, up 8.5 percent from the second quarter of 2011. Washington, Pa., was second with 7.8-percent growth, followed by McLean, Ill. (7.2 percent), and San Mateo, Calif. (7.1 percent).
Eighty-six large counties in the U.S. experienced over-the-year declines in average weekly wages, led by Williamson, Texas, with a loss of 17.0 percent over the year. Kitsap, Wash. (-4.2 percent), had the second-largest weekly wage decline among the large counties, followed by Arlington, Va. (-3.8 percent), Durham, N.C. (-3.6 percent), and Benton, Wash. (-3.4 percent).
Large county average weekly wages
Average weekly wages in 7 of Maryland’s 8 large counties were above the U.S. average of $903; these 7 counties all placed in the top 100 among the 328 largest counties in the United States in the second quarter of 2012. Three of these counties—Montgomery, Howard, and Baltimore City—ranked in the top 50 nationwide, placing 15th, 31st, and 49th, respectively. The average weekly wage in Maryland’s other large county, Frederick, also placed in the top half of the national ranking, at 121st.
Average wages in Maryland’s smaller counties
Fifteen of the 16 counties in Maryland with employment under 75,000 had average weekly wages below the national average. The exception was St. Mary’s with an average wage of $1,139. Worcester County reported the lowest weekly wage in the state, averaging $526 in the second quarter of 2012. (See table 2.)
When all 24 counties in Maryland were considered, 16, or two-thirds, had wages below the national average of $903. Seven of these reported average weekly wages below $700. (See chart 1.) Of the eight counties with wages above the national average, three (Montgomery, St. Mary’s, and Howard) had average weekly wages above $1,100. Five of the eight counties with above-average wages were concentrated in the Baltimore metropolitan area, while two were located in the Washington metropolitan area. Five of the seven lower-paid counties, those with wages below $700, were located on the Delmarva Peninsula.
Additional statistics and other information
QCEW data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit the QCEW Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/.
Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2011 edition of this publication contains selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as selected data from the first quarter 2012 version of the national news release. Tables and additional content from Employment and Wages Annual Averages 2011 are now available online at www.bls.gov/cew/cewbultn11.htm. The 2012 edition of Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online will be available later in 2013.
Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: 202-691-5200; Federal Relay Service: 1-800-877-8339.
Technical Note
Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The 9.2 million employer reports cover 132.9 million full- and part-time workers. The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/; however, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s Web site.
QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons—some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.
The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.
| Area | Employment | Average Weekly Wage(3) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 2012 (thousands) | Percent change, June 2011-12(4) | National ranking by percent change(5) | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level(5) | Percent change, second quarter 2011-12(4) | National ranking by percent change(5) | |
United States(6) |
132,896.0 | 1.8 | -- | $903 | -- | 1.3 | -- |
Maryland |
2,550.2 | 1.5 | -- | 992 | 7 | 0.7 | 39 |
Anne Arundel, Md. |
242.4 | 3.6 | 27 | 958 | 76 | -0.8 | 285 |
Baltimore, Md. |
366.1 | 1.1 | 204 | 917 | 98 | 1.8 | 111 |
Baltimore City, Md. |
329.9 | 0.1 | 280 | 1,020 | 49 | -1.4 | 302 |
Frederick, Md. |
94.2 | 0.5 | 253 | 889 | 121 | 2.7 | 66 |
Harford, Md. |
88.2 | 3.2 | 44 | 917 | 98 | 2.8 | 61 |
Howard, Md. |
162.0 | 2.7 | 72 | 1,106 | 31 | 2.7 | 66 |
Montgomery, Md. |
455.8 | 1.4 | 176 | 1,222 | 15 | 1.2 | 153 |
Prince George's, Md. |
302.6 | 0.0 | 288 | 979 | 62 | -0.4 | 262 |
|
Footnotes: |
|||||||
| Area | Employment June 2012 (thousands) | Average weekly wage(3) |
|---|---|---|
United States(4) |
132,896.0 | $903 |
Maryland |
2,550.2 | 992 |
Allegany |
29.5 | 640 |
Anne Arundel |
242.4 | 958 |
Baltimore County |
366.1 | 917 |
Baltimore City |
329.9 | 1,020 |
Calvert |
22.0 | 775 |
Caroline |
9.0 | 661 |
Carroll |
56.1 | 705 |
Cecil |
29.6 | 783 |
Charles |
41.3 | 767 |
Dorchester |
11.4 | 651 |
Frederick |
94.2 | 889 |
Garrett |
11.9 | 582 |
Harford |
88.2 | 917 |
Howard |
162.0 | 1,106 |
Kent |
8.2 | 670 |
Montgomery |
455.8 | 1,222 |
Prince George's |
302.6 | 979 |
Queen Anne's |
14.2 | 652 |
St. Mary's |
42.6 | 1,139 |
Somerset |
6.7 | 716 |
Talbot |
18.7 | 715 |
Washington |
67.7 | 705 |
Wicomico |
44.8 | 703 |
Worcester |
29.8 | 526 |
|
Footnotes: |
||
| State | Employment | Average weekly wage(3) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 2012 (thousands) | Percent change, June 2011-12 | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level | Percent change, second quarter 2011-12 | National ranking by percent change | |
United States(4) |
132,896.0 | 1.8 | 903 | -- | 1.3 | -- |
Alabama |
1,841.7 | 0.9 | 783 | 34 | 2.0 | 20 |
Alaska |
342.9 | 2.1 | 955 | 8 | 1.5 | 29 |
Arizona |
2,393.9 | 2.6 | 862 | 18 | 2.1 | 17 |
Arkansas |
1,157.4 | 1.1 | 717 | 47 | 2.1 | 17 |
California |
15,045.8 | 2.4 | 1,034 | 6 | 1.8 | 24 |
Colorado |
2,291.8 | 2.5 | 918 | 14 | 2.0 | 20 |
Connecticut |
1,650.0 | 1.2 | 1,111 | 2 | -0.4 | 50 |
Delaware |
409.3 | 0.2 | 948 | 11 | 2.4 | 13 |
District of Columbia |
717.9 | 0.9 | 1,544 | 1 | 0.3 | 44 |
Florida |
7,233.7 | 2.0 | 805 | 30 | 0.4 | 42 |
Georgia |
3,854.7 | 1.4 | 848 | 22 | 1.9 | 22 |
Hawaii |
603.7 | 2.1 | 812 | 28 | 1.8 | 24 |
Idaho |
626.1 | 1.5 | 673 | 51 | 0.9 | 38 |
Illinois |
5,698.0 | 1.1 | 953 | 9 | 1.6 | 27 |
Indiana |
2,832.6 | 2.3 | 763 | 41 | 1.9 | 22 |
Iowa |
1,502.7 | 1.5 | 743 | 43 | 2.5 | 12 |
Kansas |
1,334.4 | 1.7 | 763 | 41 | 1.1 | 35 |
Kentucky |
1,780.7 | 1.6 | 772 | 38 | 1.6 | 27 |
Louisiana |
1,877.2 | 1.6 | 806 | 29 | 1.5 | 29 |
Maine |
601.8 | 1.2 | 719 | 45 | 1.0 | 37 |
Maryland |
2,550.2 | 1.5 | 992 | 7 | 0.7 | 39 |
Massachusetts |
3,301.5 | 1.9 | 1,109 | 3 | -1.2 | 51 |
Michigan |
3,984.0 | 2.1 | 859 | 19 | 1.7 | 26 |
Minnesota |
2,695.1 | 1.5 | 907 | 15 | 1.1 | 35 |
Mississippi |
1,087.4 | 0.6 | 681 | 49 | 2.9 | 3 |
Missouri |
2,629.1 | 0.4 | 791 | 32 | 2.2 | 15 |
Montana |
442.0 | 2.0 | 700 | 48 | 2.6 | 8 |
Nebraska |
930.9 | 2.0 | 719 | 45 | 0.7 | 39 |
Nevada |
1,141.7 | 1.6 | 815 | 27 | -0.1 | 48 |
New Hampshire |
623.8 | 1.4 | 891 | 17 | 0.3 | 44 |
New Jersey |
3,884.0 | 1.4 | 1,056 | 5 | 0.0 | 47 |
New Mexico |
791.9 | 0.4 | 783 | 34 | 2.6 | 8 |
New York |
8,701.2 | 1.5 | 1,096 | 4 | 0.4 | 42 |
North Carolina |
3,919.1 | 1.5 | 787 | 33 | 0.5 | 41 |
North Dakota |
420.3 | 9.9 | 854 | 21 | 11.1 | 1 |
Ohio |
5,104.0 | 1.9 | 817 | 25 | 2.8 | 4 |
Oklahoma |
1,543.4 | 1.9 | 768 | 39 | 2.7 | 6 |
Oregon |
1,663.9 | 1.6 | 837 | 24 | 2.3 | 14 |
Pennsylvania |
5,645.9 | 0.7 | 893 | 16 | 2.1 | 17 |
Rhode Island |
463.1 | 0.9 | 859 | 19 | -0.3 | 49 |
South Carolina |
1,830.7 | 1.5 | 736 | 44 | 1.4 | 31 |
South Dakota |
412.8 | 1.9 | 677 | 50 | 3.2 | 2 |
Tennessee |
2,669.1 | 2.0 | 816 | 26 | 2.8 | 4 |
Texas |
10,779.5 | 3.0 | 922 | 13 | 2.6 | 8 |
Utah |
1,225.8 | 3.6 | 766 | 40 | 1.3 | 34 |
Vermont |
300.2 | 1.0 | 792 | 31 | 2.6 | 8 |
Virginia |
3,659.9 | 1.2 | 952 | 10 | 0.3 | 44 |
Washington |
2,948.3 | 2.4 | 947 | 12 | 2.2 | 15 |
West Virginia |
712.3 | 1.4 | 776 | 37 | 1.4 | 31 |
Wisconsin |
2,749.7 | 1.4 | 778 | 36 | 1.4 | 31 |
Wyoming |
288.9 | 1.6 | 842 | 23 | 2.7 | 6 |
Puerto Rico |
933.3 | 1.8 | 499 | (5) | 0.6 | (5) |
Virgin Islands |
40.2 | -8.6 | 819 | (5) | 9.8 | (5) |
|
Footnotes: |
||||||
Last Modified Date: January 24, 2013