News Release Information

Monday, July 27, 2015


Technical information:
Media contact:
  • (972) 850-4800

Occupational Employment and Wages in Lafayette, May 2014

Workers in the Lafayette Metropolitan Statistical Area had an average (mean) hourly wage of $18.94 in May 2014, about 17 percent below the nationwide average of $22.71, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Regional Commissioner Stanley W. Suchman noted that, after testing for statistical significance, wages in the local area were higher than their respective national averages in 2 of the 22 major occupational groups including production workers. Seventeen groups had wages that were measurably lower than their respective national averages, including computer and mathematical; legal; and protective service.

When compared to the nationwide distribution, local employment was more highly concentrated in 7 of the 22 occupational groups, including installation, maintenance, and repair; construction and extraction; and production. Conversely, ten groups had employment shares significantly below their national representation, including education, training, and library; business and financial operations; and computer and mathematical. (See table A and box note at end of release.)

Table A. Occupational employment and wages by major occupational group, United States and the Lafayette Metropolitan Statistical Area, and measures of statistical significance, May 2014
Major occupational group Percent of total employment Mean hourly wage
United States Lafayette United States Lafayette Percent

Total, all occupations

100.0% 100.0%   $22.71 $18.94 * -17


5.0 3.6 * 54.08 47.12 * -13

Business and financial operations

5.1 2.9 * 34.81 27.74 * -20

Computer and mathematical

2.8 1.1 * 40.37 25.18 * -38

Architecture and engineering

1.8 2.6 * 39.19 32.66 * -17

Life, physical, and social science

0.8 0.6 * 33.69 33.80   0

Community and social service

1.4 1.1 * 21.79 20.04 * -8


0.8 0.9   48.61 32.87 * -32

Education, training, and library

6.2 3.8 * 25.10 24.05   -4

Arts, design, entertainment, sports, and media

1.3 0.7 * 26.82 18.58 * -31

Healthcare practitioners and technical

5.8 5.7   36.54 29.20 * -20

Healthcare support

2.9 2.8   13.86 10.74 * -23

Protective service

2.4 1.6 * 21.14 16.15 * -24

Food preparation and serving related

9.1 9.1   10.57 9.45 * -11

Building and grounds cleaning and maintenance

3.2 2.3 * 12.68 10.22 * -19

Personal care and service

3.1 3.5 * 12.01 9.64 * -20

Sales and related

10.5 12.3 * 18.59 15.28 * -18

Office and administrative support

16.0 14.7 * 17.08 15.17 * -11

Farming, fishing, and forestry

0.3 (2)   12.09 17.07 * 41

Construction and extraction

3.9 6.7 * 22.40 20.05 * -10

Installation, maintenance, and repair

3.9 6.9 * 21.74 19.86 * -9


6.6 8.4 * 17.06 18.85 * 10

Transportation and material moving

6.8 8.5 * 16.57 17.11   3

(1) A positive percent difference measures how much the mean wage in Lafayette is above the national mean wage, while a negative difference reflects a lower wage.
(2) Estimates not released.

* The percent share of employment or mean hourly wage for this area is significantly different from the national average of all areas at the 90-percent confidence level.

One occupational group–production–was chosen to illustrate the diversity of data available for any of the 22 major occupational categories. Lafayette had 13,110 jobs in production, accounting for 8.4 percent of local area employment, significantly higher than the 6.6-percent national share. More importantly, at $18.85 per hour, the local average hourly wage for this occupational group was about 10 percent higher than the national average of $17.06.

With employment of 2,080, welders, cutters, solderers, and brazers was one of the largest occupations within the production group, as were machinists (1,870), and inspectors, testers, sorters, samplers, and weighers (1,450). Among the higher paying jobs were first-line supervisors of production and operating workers, and petroleum pump system operators, refinery operators, and gaugers with mean hourly wages of $29.35 and $25.07, respectively. At the lower end of the wage scale were laundry and dry-cleaning workers ($9.18) and meat, poultry, and fish cutters and trimmers ($10.26). (Detailed occupational data for production are presented in table 1; for a complete listing of all detailed occupations, see

Location quotients allow us to explore the occupational make-up of a metropolitan area by comparing the composition of jobs in an area relative to the national average. (See table 1.) For example, a location quotient of 2.0 indicates that an occupation accounts for twice the share of employment in the area than it does nationally. In the Lafayette metropolitan area, above average concentrations of employment were found in many of the occupations within the production group. For instance, petroleum pump system operators, refinery operators, and gaugers were employed at 11.3 times the national average in Lafayette, one of the higher location quotients among all metropolitan areas for this particular occupation. Additionally, welders, cutters, solderers, and brazers were employed at 4.9 times the national rate. On the other hand, laundry and dry-cleaning workers had a location quotient of 0.9 in Lafayette, indicating that this occupation’s local and national employment shares were similar.

These statistics are from the Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) survey, a federal-state cooperative program between BLS and State Workforce Agencies, in this case, the Louisiana Workforce Commission.


A value that is statistically different from another does not necessarily mean that the difference has economic or practical significance. Statistical significance is concerned with the ability to make confident statements about a universe based on a sample. It is entirely possible that a large difference between two values is not significantly different statistically, while a small difference is, since both the size and heterogeneity of the sample affect the relative error of the data being tested.

Technical Note

The Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) survey is a semiannual mail survey measuring occupational employment and wage rates for wage and salary workers in nonfarm establishments in the United States. Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands are also surveyed, but their data are not included in the national estimates. OES estimates are constructed from a sample of about 1.2 million establishments. Forms are mailed to approximately 200,000 sampled establishments in May and November each year. May 2014 estimates are based on responses from six semiannual panels collected over a 3-year period: May 2014, November 2013, May 2013, November 2012, May 2012, and November 2011. The overall national response rate for the six panels is 74.3 percent based on establishments and 70.5 percent based on weighted sampled employment. The unweighted employment of sampled establishments across all six semiannual panels represents approximately 57.1 percent of total national employment. (Response rates are slightly lower for these estimates due to the federal shutdown in October 2013.) The sample in the Lafayette Metropolitan Statistical Area included 1,986 establishments with a response rate of 76 percent. For more information about OES concepts and methodology, go to

The OES survey provides estimates of employment and hourly and annual wages for wage and salary workers in 22 major occupational groups and 821 detailed occupations for the nation, states, metropolitan statistical areas, metropolitan divisions, and nonmetropolitan areas. In addition, employment and wage estimates for 94 minor groups and 458 broad occupations are available in the national data. OES data by state and metropolitan/nonmetropolitan area are available from and, respectively.

The May 2014 OES estimates are based on the 2010 Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system and the 2012 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). Information about the 2010 SOC is available on the BLS website at and information about the 2012 NAICS is available at

Area definitions
The substate area data published in this release reflect the standards and definitions established by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget.

The Lafayette Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) includes Lafayette and St. Martin Parishes in Louisiana.

Additional information
OES data are available on our regional web page at Answers to frequently asked questions about the OES data are available at Detailed technical information about the OES survey is available in our Survey Methods and Reliability Statement on the BLS website at

Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339.

Table 1. Employment and wage data from the Occupational Employment Statistics survey, by occupation, Lafayette Metropolitan Statistical Area, May 2014
Occupation(1) Employment Mean wages
Level(2) Location
Hourly Annual(4)

Production occupations

13,110 1.3 $18.85 $39,210

First-line supervisors of production and operating workers

940 1.4 29.35 61,040

Structural metal fabricators and fitters

300 3.3 19.44 40,430

Team assemblers

400 0.3 14.33 29,800

Assemblers and fabricators, all other

180 0.6 15.04 31,290


130 0.6 11.31 23,520

Butchers and meat cutters

180 1.1 13.85 28,810

Meat, poultry, and fish cutters and trimmers

250 1.4 10.26 21,330

Food batchmakers

50 0.4 13.69 28,480

Computer-controlled machine tool operators, metal and plastic

230 1.3 19.49 40,540

Computer numerically controlled machine tool programmers, metal and plastic

140 4.7 22.54 46,880

Cutting, punching, and press machine setters, operators, and tenders, metal and plastic

140 0.7 16.68 34,700

Drilling and boring machine tool setters, operators, and tenders, metal and plastic

120 6.0 21.17 44,040

Grinding, lapping, polishing, and buffing machine tool setters, operators, and tenders, metal and plastic

(5) (5) 15.67 32,600

Lathe and turning machine tool setters, operators, and tenders, metal and plastic

80 1.6 20.23 42,080

Milling and planing machine setters, operators, and tenders, metal and plastic

70 2.7 21.44 44,600


1,870 4.1 20.73 43,120

Tool and die makers

70 0.8 18.68 38,860

Welders, cutters, solderers, and brazers

2,080 4.9 19.33 40,200

Welding, soldering, and brazing machine setters, operators, and tenders

50 0.8 21.28 44,270

Printing press operators

50 0.3 15.55 32,340

Print binding and finishing workers

50 0.9 13.79 28,690

Laundry and dry-cleaning workers

220 0.9 9.18 19,080

Pressers, textile, garment, and related materials

150 2.6 10.12 21,060

Sewing machine operators

(5) (5) 12.79 26,600

Cabinetmakers and bench carpenters

70 0.7 14.69 30,560

Stationary engineers and boiler operators

40 0.9 19.22 39,970

Water and wastewater treatment plant and system operators

90 0.7 18.35 38,160

Petroleum pump system operators, refinery operators, and gaugers

540 11.3 25.07 52,140

Plant and system operators, all other

150 11.0 29.38 61,120

Crushing, grinding, and polishing machine setters, operators, and tenders

60 1.6 12.81 26,640

Cutting and slicing machine setters, operators, and tenders

110 1.5 18.34 38,150

Inspectors, testers, sorters, samplers, and weighers

1,450 2.6 19.95 41,490

Packaging and filling machine operators and tenders

170 0.4 11.42 23,750

Coating, painting, and spraying machine setters, operators, and tenders

70 0.6 13.77 28,640

Painters, transportation equipment

50 0.8 21.96 45,670

Molders, shapers, and casters, except metal and plastic

40 0.9 14.88 30,950

Helpers-production workers

780 1.6 12.20 25,370

Production workers, all other

530 2.1 18.98 39,470

(1) For a complete listing of all detailed occupations in the Lafayette MSA, see
(2) Estimates for detailed occupations do not sum to the totals because the totals include occupations not shown separately. Estimates do not include self-employed workers.
(3) The location quotient is the ratio of the area concentration of occupational employment to the national average concentration. A location quotient greater than one indicates the occupation has a higher share of employment than average, and a location quotient less than one indicates the occupation is less prevalent in the area than average.
(4) Annual wages have been calculated by multiplying the hourly mean wage by a 'year-round, full-time' hours figure of 2,080 hours; for those occupations where there is not an hourly mean wage published, the annual wage has been directly calculated from the reported survey data.
(5) Estimates not released.


Last Modified Date: Monday, July 27, 2015