April 7, 1999 (The Editor’s Desk is updated each business day.)
Single- and multi-employer defined
benefit pension plans differ
About one-fifth of all workers with
traditional pension plans are covered by multi-employer, as opposed to single employer,
plans. Multi-employer plans enable employees to gain credit towards a pension from work
with several different employers. Portability and age-of-retirement provisions differ in
these two types of plans.

[Chart data—TXT]
Portability agreements with other plans apply to 60 percent of employees
under multi-employer plans compared to 3 percent of those under single employer plans.
These provisions allow participants to transfer years of credited service or accumulated
benefits from one plan to another. Because multi-employer pension plans are typically
found in industries characterized by workers who switch employers frequently (in some
cases to employers not participating in the original multi-employer plan), a greater need
exists for such portability of benefits.
Multi-employer plans are more likely than single-employer plans to provide normal
(unreduced) retirement benefits for those retiring before age 65. In 1994-95, some 52
percent of employees in single-employer plans could not retire until age 65, compared with
33 percent of employees in multi-employer plans. Furthermore, some 39 percent of employees
in multi-employer plans could retire at age 62, compared with only 23 percent of employees
covered by single-employer plans.
These data are a product of the BLS Employee
Benefits Survey. Additional information is available from
"Multiemployer Pension Plans" (PDF
37K), Compensation
and Working Conditions, Spring 1999.
Of interest
Spotlight on Statistics: The Recession of 2007–2009
The most recent recession in the United States began in December 2007 and ended in June 2009, though many of the statistics that describe the U.S. economy have yet to return to their pre-recession values. In this Spotlight, we present BLS data that compare the recent recession to previous recessions.
Read more »
|