| Skip Navigation Links | Latest Numbers | |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| www.bls.gov | ||||
Profiles of Significant Disputes in 2004 and 2005Communications Workers of America and SBC Communications, Inc.The largest stoppage of 2004, in terms of number of workers idled, was between SBC Communications, Inc. (SBC) and the Communications Workers of America (CWA). This stoppage idled 102,000 workers. With SBC’s four regional contracts set to expire in April (April 1 for SBC West, April 3 for SBC Midwest, SBC Southwest, and SBC East), the two sides began collective bargaining talks in February around the country. On March 15, SBC and CWA representatives began to conduct negotiations on national issues at the Washington, D.C. headquarters of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS). On April 7, in accordance with a prior agreement, the CWA gave SBC a 30-day notice that there may be a stoppage of work after the contracts’ expiration dates passed without a new agreement4, and on April 29, union members voted to give union officials authorization to call a work stoppage.5 On May 19, with the main points of the talks -- wages, job security, health care, and pensions -- being unresolved, CWA stopped national negotiations and called for a four-day stoppage beginning on May 21.6 On May 25, 2004, the CWA and SBC agreed to a contract that was met with approval from both sides, ending the stoppage. The contract allowed for across-the-board wage increases of 12 percent over the next five years with an additional one-percent lump-sum payment in the first year, along with cost-of-living adjustments during the fourth and fifth years of the contract. Employees would also receive cash bonuses of $250 in April 2006 and $375 in April 2007 and 2008. In the area of health care, SBC promised to continue to pay the full cost of health care premiums for active and retired employees.7 Home Healthcare Agencies and the Service Employees International UnionThe work stoppage involving New York City Home Healthcare Agencies (HHA) and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 1199 was the third largest work stoppage in terms of workers idled in 2004. On May 12, with some agency contracts having been expired for as long as a year, SEIU issued notices that its members would stop work for 72 hours starting on June 7. The union wanted to increase wages from between $6 and $7 per hour to $10 per hour, and also sought to gain benefits such as health insurance, vacation, sick pay, and pensions for its members.8 On the seventh of June, 23,000 HHA employees began to strike. The stoppage ended as planned on June 9 after 72 hours. By that time, tentative agreements had been reached with agencies employing over half of the union members participating in the work stoppage. Terms of the agreement included a wage increase to $10 per hour by June 2007, as well as a guaranteed hour system for the aides.9 Automobile Dealers Association, International Association of Machinists, and the International Brotherhood of TeamstersThe longest work stoppage of 2004, lasting 52 days, was between the Automobile Dealers Association in St. Louis, Missouri, the International Association of Machinists (IAM), and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT). The stoppage began on August 1, when IAM and IBT members voted to reject separate contract offers with the Automobile Dealers Association. The main point of contention for the IBT was a provision in the contract that would reduce vacation and sick leave for new employees. The IBT also had issues with proposed pay increases, as the new contract would not increase wages at all in the first year and would increase wages 25 cents per hour for higher-paid workers in years two and three. There would be a 15-cent increase for lower-paid workers in the second and third years of the contract. The IAM rejected a similar offer from the Automobile Dealers Association. On October 9, the IBT approved a new contract; it was accepted after the Teamsters had rejected two previous offers from the Dealers Association. However, the work stoppage did not end because the IAM had not approved a new contract and the IBT honored the Machinists’ picket lines. The new IBT contract provided for a 25-cent-per-hour increase in wages for all employees, and the dealers would continue to pay the full cost of health, dental, and vision premiums. The contract also reduced vacation and sick leave for employees, as workers can no longer accumulate a fourth week of vacation, and employees will have to work longer before being able to earn a second and third week of vacation, while sick leave was halved.10 The stoppage ended on October 14, after IAM members voted to approve a new contract presented by a federal mediator. This came days after the mechanics voted for a third time to reject a contract offer from the dealers. The accepted proposal provides for a 25-cent-per-hour increase in wages in each year of the contract. The contract also addressed another major issue for the IAM: the proposed expansion of tasks performed by helpers. The union felt that this would lead to a reduction in employment for higher-paid journeymen. Under the approved contract, the dealers could hire any number of helpers, but had to keep the same number of journeymen from July 1, 2004. If the number of journeymen was reduced, dealers could have one helper for every three journeymen until 2007, when they could have one helper for every two journeymen.11 Northwest Airlines and the Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal AssociationThe work stoppage involving Northwest Airlines and the Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association (AMFA) was the largest in 2005 in terms of days idle, with 371,700 days of idleness, idling 4,200 workers. It was also the second longest in 2005, lasting 91 days. The stoppage began on August 20, when AMFA members refused to accept pay cuts and lay offs to about half of the union’s members. Northwest Airlines had proposed a pay decrease of about 25 percent as well as a layoff about 2,000 employees. The company was prepared for a stoppage and brought in replacement workers at the beginning of the stoppage.12 This stoppage was still ongoing at year’s end. The Boeing Company and the International Association of MachinistsThe work stoppage affecting Boeing and the International Association of Machinists was the second largest work stoppage in 2005 in terms of worker participation, idling 18,300 workers, and the second longest in terms of days of idleness among stoppages beginning in 2005, causing 366,000 idle days. The stoppage began on September 2, three days after Boeing made its last offer. Pension benefits were a major issue of contention, with the union rejecting the company’s proposal to raise the pension multiplier from $60 per year of service to $66. This was not close to the $80 per year that the union believed was possible. The sides were also far apart on the issue of lump-sum bonuses. Boeing offered lump-sum bonuses of $3000 for the first two years of the contract. Union members could have then contributed the bonuses to their retirement accounts, with the company matching 50 percent of the contribution. The union rejected the offer, and 86 percent of the membership voted for a work stoppage13 on September 1. The stoppage ended after 28 days, on September 30. The agreement raised the pension multiplier from $60 to $70 per year of service. It also gave employees a $3,000 lump-sum bonus for years two and three of the contract, as well as an 8-percent ratification bonus. The new agreement maintained current health care plans under the same cost provisions of the previous contract; retiree medical coverage was also unchanged.14 New York City Metropolitan Transit Authority and the Transit Workers Union (TWU)This was the largest work stoppage, as measured by worker participation, in 2005, involving 35,000 employees. On December 20, transit workers began the work stoppage after the two sides were unable to come to an agreement the previous night. The Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) had offered annual raises of 3 percent, 4 percent, and 3.5 percent, over the next three years, respectively; the union rejected this offer. However, the main point of contention was the MTA’s proposal to increase the age for employees to be eligible for a full pension from 55 to 62, which the union cited as unfair.15 On December 23, TWU members returned to work as negotiations resumed.16 The MTA and TWU reached an agreement on December 27, but the agreement was voted down by the union’s membership in January of 2006. Union members voted for a second time in April, this time voting for ratification of the contract. However, the MTA would not recognize the second vote, and now the TWU has brought a lawsuit against the MTA in an effort to have the contract recognized.17
Notes1 For more information, please read Major Work Stoppages in 2004, USDL 05-598 (U.S. Department of Labor), April 8, 2005; and Major Work Stoppages in 2005, USDL 06-363 (U.S. Department of Labor), March 2, 2006; or see the Collective Bargaining page of the BLS website at http://www.bls.gov/cba/home.htm. 2 This stoppage idled 23,000 workers on its first day, and 17,000 on its second and third days for an average of 19,000. 3 For more information on the major work stoppages data series, including why it is difficult for BLS to identify accurately the relationship between collective bargaining agreement expirations and work stoppages, see Michael H. Cimini and John K. Steinmeyer, "What Can You Tell Me About Collective Bargaining Expirations and Work Stoppages?" Compensation and Working Conditions Online, May 28, 2003; available on the Internet at http://www.bls.gov/opub/cwc/cb20030522ar01p1.htm. 4 See "CWA Gives 30-Day Strike Notice to SBC; Contract Talks to Continue, Union Says," Daily Labor Report, April 8, 2004, p. A-13. 5 See "CWA Members Authorize Strike Against SBC Communications if Necessary," Daily Labor Report, April 30, 2004, p. A-7. 6 See "CWA Sets Four-Day Strike at SBC To Start May 21, Ends National Bargaining," Daily Labor Report, May 20, 2004, p. A-13. 7 See "CWA, SBC Communications Announce Tentative Agreement for 102,000 Employees," Daily Labor Report, May 26, 2004, p. A-8. 8 See "Home Health Care Aides in New York Set to Walk Off Their Jobs June 7-9," Daily Labor Report, June 1, 2004, p. A-2. 9 See "Rivera Pledges More Strikes in July in New York City Home Care Campaign," Daily Labor Report, June 10, 2004, p. A-11. 10 See "Teamsters Ratify Contract With Auto Dealers in St. Louis; Strike Goes on With IAM in Talks," Daily Labor Report, October 13, 2004, p. A-11. 11 See "Striking Auto Mechanics in St. Louis Vote to Approve Mediator’s Contract Proposal," Daily Labor Report, October 18, 2004, p. A-9. 12 See Joshua Freed, "Northwest Hires Replacements as Strike Goes On," The Washington Post, August 22, 2005. 13 See James Wallace, "Boeing, Union Differ by $1 Billion, Mulally Says," Seattle Post-Intelligencer, September 9, 2005. 14 See James Wallace, "Boeing Machinists Back in the Fold," Seattle Post-Intelligencer, September 30, 2005. 15 See Desmond Butler, "New York City Transit Workers Strike," The Associated Press, Dec 20, 2005. 16 See Steven Greenhouse and Sewell Chan, "Workers Choose to Come Back and Talk," The New York Times, December 23, 2005. 17 See Anemona Hartocollis, "Metro Briefing | New York: Manhattan: Transit Union Sues on Contract," The New York Times, May 2, 2006.
|
| ||||||||||||||||||