How to Use the Employment Cost Index for EscalationThe Employment Cost Index (ECI), published by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), is a quarterly measure of the change in the cost of labor, free from the influence of employment shifts among occupations and industries. The compensation series includes changes in wages and salaries and employer costs for employee benefits. The wage and salary series and the benefit costs series provide the change for the two components of compensation. The ECI is designated as a principal economic indicator. It is the only measure of labor costs that treats wages and salaries and total compensation consistently, and provides regular sub-series by occupation, industry, and region. The ECI is used by the Federal Reserve Board to monitor the effects of fiscal and monetary policies and in formulating those policies. According to former Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan, "The ECI is indispensable to understanding America's economy. It ensures the accuracy of the statistics on employers' compensation costs that we rely on for economic policy making and successful business planning." The ECI is particularly well suited as a vehicle to adjust wage rates to keep pace with what is paid by other employers for two reasons. First, it is comprehensive. It includes not only wages and salaries but also employer costs for employee benefits, and covers nearly all employees in the civilian (non-Federal) economy. Second, it measures the "pure" change in labor costs; that is, it is not affected by changes in relative employment of industries and occupations with different wage and compensation levels.
The following are general guidelines to consider when developing an escalation agreement using the Employment Cost Index: SPECIFY the costs to be escalated (wages and salaries, benefits costs, or total compensation); indicate the specific occupations covered; indicate the month or year of the base labor costs; indicate the reference quarter to be used; and specify how long the contract will be in effect. IDENTIFY an appropriate index and series. Choose the index and series to use that is reflective of the occupations you are trying to escalate (e.g., ECI for Total Compensation (not seasonally adjusted), private industry workers, service-providing industries, sales and office occupations). An important consideration when choosing a series for escalation is the sampling error. Series with smaller numbers of workers may have larger sampling error or may be dominated by a small number of employers. For example, local area indexes often exhibit greater volatility than the national index, although long-term trends can remain similar. STATE the frequency of adjustment. Adjustments are usually made at fixed time intervals, such as quarterly, semi-annually, or most often, annually. COMPUTE the percentage increase. Divide the index number for the most recent period by the index number for the prior period to determine the percentage increase. Multiply the percentage increase by the base labor cost to determine the escalated labor cost. PROVIDE for missing or discontinued data. Procedures should be provided in the event that required data are missing or discontinued (e.g. use the sales and office series if the office and administrative support series is missing). In the first 30 years since it was introduced in 1975, the ECI rarely dropped a series. However, the change in industry and occupation systems implemented in March 2006 resulted in the break in continuity and discontinuation of several series. Others are slated to be dropped in March 2007. For more information, see www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2006/04/art2full.pdf.
AVOID locking indexes used for escalation into any particular reference period (e.g. December 2005=100).
Suppose a collective bargaining agreement contains the following language: "For years two and three of this contract, on July 1 of each year, basic hourly wage rates for each step and grade will be adjusted by the percentage change in the Employment Cost Index for private industry workers, wages and salaries (not seasonally adjusted), from March of the prior year to March of the current year. That is, the increase to go into effect on July 1, 2002 will be the increase in the ECI series between March 2001 and March 2002, while the increase to go into effect on July 1, 2003 will be the increase in the ECI between March of 2002 and March of 2003." The cost to be escalated is: wages and salaries The index to be used is: private industry workers, wages and salaries (not seasonally adjusted), March quarter The frequency of adjustment is: annually The calculation is: Assume that in June 2001 wage rates for three occupations, in the example, were as follows:
Carpenters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$15.42
Janitors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.45
Truckdrivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.00
The ECI private industry wages and salaries index for March 2001 is 149.4 and for March 2002 is 154.7. Then the adjustments would be 154.7/149.4 = 1.035
$15.42 * 1.035 = $15.96
7.45 * 1.035 = 7.71
14.00 * 1.035 = 14.49
The ECI is published on a seasonally adjusted basis as well as on an unadjusted basis. Seasonal adjustment removes the effects of events that follow a more or less regular pattern each year. These seasonal adjustments make nonseasonal patterns easier to identify. The primary use of seasonally adjusted data is for current economic analysis. The factors that are used to seasonally adjust the data are updated annually. Also, seasonally adjusted data that have been published earlier are subject to revision for up to 5 years after their original release. For these reasons, the use of seasonally adjusted data in escalation agreements is inappropriate. The Bureau of Labor Statistics neither encourages nor discourages the use of wage adjustment measures in contractual agreements. Also, while BLS can provide technical and statistical assistance to parties developing escalation agreements, we can neither develop specific wording for contracts nor mediate legal or interpretive disputes that might arise between the parties to the agreement. BLS neither encourages nor discourages the use of wage adjustment measures in contractual agreements. Also, while BLS can provide technical and statistical assistance to parties developing escalation agreements, we can neither develop specific wording for contracts nor mediate legal or interpretive disputes that might arise between the parties to the agreement.
For more detailed information on escalator clauses, see Albert E. Schwenk, "Escalation in Employer Costs for Employee Compensation: A Guide to Contracting Parties," Compensation and Working Conditions, Spring 1997, found at www.bls.gov/opub/cwc/archive.htm. (Prior issues can be found under Archives.) For a copy of this report or for any additional information about the ECI, call or write to:
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Last Modified Date: July 26, 2006 |
| www.dol.gov |
|
Frequently Asked Questions |
Freedom of Information Act |
Customer Survey |
Important Web Site Notices
Privacy & Security Statement | Linking and Copyright Information | Technical (web) question | Other comments ![]() Sorry for the interruption.Please help us improve our website by participating in the survey that begins below! Our Pledge of Privacy
Click on the yes button below to take the survey after you have finished visiting our website. The survey will be available in the taskbar at the bottom of your screen when you are ready to take it. |
|